For 68% of Italian students, the perfect training opens up the world of work and connects them to companies. And 72% of students prefer the hybrid educational model.

The data comes from a survey of 1,600 members of the Docsity community by OPIT – The Open Institute of Technology.

OPIT founder Riccardo Ocleppo states: “Students need more practical learning and skills that allow for a faster and more profitable entry into a company.”


Milan, 19 June 2023 – Italian students aged between 18 and 26 prefer educational and training offerings based on the hybrid models and a focus on up-to-date training provided by quality teaching staff. They’re also less likely to believe that the name of a university is enough to guarantee job opportunities upon graduating. These are some of the chief findings to emerge from an OPIT survey of 1,600 students (secondary level and university) who are part of the Docsity community – a platform for sharing documents and interesting content – just a few days before the beginning of final exams.


The results show that students consider job opportunities and connections with companies as the main factors when evaluating study opportunities (68%). Cost is also an important criterion (39.6%), as is the updating of teaching methods and practical aspects of the course to ensure they’re aligned with today’s work environment (33.1%). Furthermore, 21.7% of those surveyed note the quality of the teaching staff as being crucial to helping them absorb the skills they need to succeed as workers in the future. The “name” and reputation of a university of training provider only matters to 13% of those surveyed.


“The data confirms what we had foreseen when we decided to enter the education market,” says OPIT’s founder and director Riccardo Ocleppo. “Involving companies in our programs was a top priority, and their insights were instrumental in designing the modules we created, including what technologies to rely on and the programming languages we work with, for example.”


“By working with companies to design our programs, we’ve found that students both require and prefer a much more hands-on learning experience. This ensures they’re up to date on current technologies, processes, and ways of working when they join a company. So, our goal for our students is that they leave OPIT feeling much more knowledgeable about what employers really need from them.”


As far as learning methods are concerned, students prefer the hybrid model – having the opportunity to participate in face-to-face lessons while retaining the flexibility to access course content online or even via a fully remote model based on their needs.  Amongst university students, 72.6% say they prefer the hybrid model, unlike secondary students, who retain a preference for my “physical” styles of teaching.


When secondary students were asked about their choice of university, 46% of boys and girls indicated engineering, computer science, and STEM as their preferred fields. Humanities and communication followed (20.6%), with economics taking the third spot (17.9%).


“Rapid developments in technology and artificial intelligence,” continues Ocleppo, “are creating new job opportunities for STEM graduates, which current students clearly understand. Specific skills are becoming increasingly important as enterprises move more and more to make the most out of the changes brought by AI. Yet, the shortage of tech workers is expected to grow even faster in the coming years. Despite the concern that the wave of AI-inspired technologies is creating, there is no doubt there will be demand for certain types of professionals with specific technical skills.”




OPIT’s data also indicates a widespread trend toward the continuation of studies beyond initial certification, belying the more pessimistic readings on the growth of the NEET (Not in Education, Employment, or Training) phenomenon. Enrolling in a degree course remains both the safest and preferred choice for the majority of secondary school students – 82% confirmed their intention to continue their studies at the university level. A further 8.3% are undecided about university, while 5% will choose short training courses, with only 2.5% of students surveyed saying they’ll stop education after their fifth-grade exams. Accredited training (university, business school, or some other form of higher education) remains the preferred choice of almost all students (94.6%).


Delving deeper into a behavioral analysis of university students, an interesting preference for further continuation of studies emerges. Over two-thirds (68%) say they wish to continue, demonstrating that a Bachelor’s degree alone is not seen as the ideal pathway into the world of work. In fact, of those who declared a willingness to continue studying after submitting their Bachelor’s thesis, 90% said they want to enroll in a new long-term study program – either a second Bachelor’s degree or a Master’s degree. It’s also significant that more university students are undecided about continuing their educations (22%) than those who are convinced they’ll finish studying permanently upon completion of their degrees (10%).


Asked about what will be most important in a future where they will have to grapple with various AI-led transitions, over half of students (56%) believe it’s essential to understand artificial intelligence and its applications. This was followed by digital marketing (42%), with cybersecurity identified by one in three students (35%) as key due to the job opportunities in that field linked to the need to protect growing amounts of personal data. Fintech closed this ranking at 3%.


OPIT – Open Institute of Technology is an academic institution accredited at the European level that provides an exclusively online training offer focused on Computer Science and a teaching staff made up of professors of international standing. OPIT stands out in the panorama of university-level training for a didactic model shaped by the need for quality, flexibility, and connection with the business world of upcoming generations. OPIT’s degree programs are oriented towards the acquisition of modern and up-to-date skills in the crucial sector of computer science. Its degrees are accredited by the MFHEA and the EQF (European Qualification Framework), and professionally recognized by employers.

https://www.opit.com/ 

Related posts

CCN: Australia Tightens Crypto Oversight as Exchanges Expand, Testing Industry’s Appetite for Regulation
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
Mar 31, 2025 3 min read

Source:

  • CCN, published on March 29th, 2025

By Kurt Robson

Over the past few months, Australia’s crypto industry has undergone a rapid transformation following the government’s proposal to establish a stricter set of digital asset regulations.

A series of recent enforcement measures and exchange launches highlight the growing maturation of Australia’s crypto landscape.

Experts remain divided on how the new rules will impact the country’s burgeoning digital asset industry.

New Crypto Regulation

On March 21, the Treasury Department said that crypto exchanges and custody services will now be classified under similar rules as other financial services in the country.

“Our legislative reforms will extend existing financial services laws to key digital asset platforms, but not to all of the digital asset ecosystem,” the Treasury said in a statement.

The rules impose similar regulations as other financial services in the country, such as obtaining a financial license, meeting minimum capital requirements, and safeguarding customer assets.

The proposal comes as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s center-left Labor government prepares for a federal election on May 17.

Australia’s opposition party, led by Peter Dutton, has also vowed to make crypto regulation a top priority of the government’s agenda if it wins.

Australia’s Crypto Growth

Triple-A data shows that 9.6% of Australians already own digital assets, with some experts believing new rules will push further adoption.

Europe’s largest crypto exchange, WhiteBIT, announced it was entering the Australian market on Wednesday, March 26.

The company said that Australia was “an attractive landscape for crypto businesses” despite its complexity.

In March, Australia’s Swyftx announced it was acquiring New Zealand’s largest cryptocurrency exchange for an undisclosed sum.

According to the parties, the merger will create the second-largest platform in Australia by trading volume.

“Australia’s new regulatory framework is akin to rolling out the welcome mat for cryptocurrency exchanges,” Alexander Jader, professor of Digital Business at the Open Institute of Technology, told CCN.

“The clarity provided by these regulations is set to attract a wave of new entrants,” he added.

Jader said regulatory clarity was “the lifeblood of innovation.” He added that the new laws can expect an uptick “in both local and international exchanges looking to establish a foothold in the market.”

However, Zoe Wyatt, partner and head of Web3 and Disruptive Technology at Andersen LLP, believes that while the new rules will benefit more extensive exchanges looking for more precise guidelines, they will not “suddenly turn Australia into a global crypto hub.”

“The Web3 community is still largely looking to the U.S. in anticipation of a more crypto-friendly stance from the Trump administration,” Wyatt added.

Read the full article below:

Read the article
Agenda Digitale: Generative AI in the Enterprise – A Guide to Conscious and Strategic Use
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
Mar 31, 2025 6 min read

Source:


By Zorina Alliata, Professor of Responsible Artificial Intelligence e Digital Business & Innovation at OPIT – Open Institute of Technology

Integrating generative AI into your business means innovating, but also managing risks. Here’s how to choose the right approach to get value

The adoption of generative AI in the enterprise is growing rapidly, bringing innovation to decision-making, creativity and operations. However, to fully exploit its potential, it is essential to define clear objectives and adopt strategies that balance benefits and risks.

Over the course of my career, I have been fortunate to experience firsthand some major technological revolutions – from the internet boom to the “renaissance” of artificial intelligence a decade ago with machine learning.

However, I have never seen such a rapid rate of adoption as the one we are experiencing now, thanks to generative AI. Although this type of AI is not yet perfect and presents significant risks – such as so-called “hallucinations” or the possibility of generating toxic content – ​​it fills a real need, both for people and for companies, generating a concrete impact on communication, creativity and decision-making processes.

Defining the Goals of Generative AI in the Enterprise

When we talk about AI, we must first ask ourselves what problems we really want to solve. As a teacher and consultant, I have always supported the importance of starting from the specific context of a company and its concrete objectives, without inventing solutions that are as “smart” as they are useless.

AI is a formidable tool to support different processes: from decision-making to optimizing operations or developing more accurate predictive analyses. But to have a significant impact on the business, you need to choose carefully which task to entrust it with, making sure that the solution also respects the security and privacy needs of your customers .

Understanding Generative AI to Adopt It Effectively

A widespread risk, in fact, is that of being guided by enthusiasm and deploying sophisticated technology where it is not really needed. For example, designing a system of reviews and recommendations for films requires a certain level of attention and consumer protection, but it is very different from an X-ray reading service to diagnose the presence of a tumor. In the second case, there is a huge ethical and medical risk at stake: it is necessary to adapt the design, control measures and governance of the AI ​​to the sensitivity of the context in which it will be used.

The fact that generative AI is spreading so rapidly is a sign of its potential and, at the same time, a call for caution. This technology manages to amaze anyone who tries it: it drafts documents in a few seconds, summarizes or explains complex concepts, manages the processing of extremely complex data. It turns into a trusted assistant that, on the one hand, saves hours of work and, on the other, fosters creativity with unexpected suggestions or solutions.

Yet, it should not be forgotten that these systems can generate “hallucinated” content (i.e., completely incorrect), or show bias or linguistic toxicity where the starting data is not sufficient or adequately “clean”. Furthermore, working with AI models at scale is not at all trivial: many start-ups and entrepreneurs initially try a successful idea, but struggle to implement it on an infrastructure capable of supporting real workloads, with adequate governance measures and risk management strategies. It is crucial to adopt consolidated best practices, structure competent teams, define a solid operating model and a continuous maintenance plan for the system.

The Role of Generative AI in Supporting Business Decisions

One aspect that I find particularly interesting is the support that AI offers to business decisions. Algorithms can analyze a huge amount of data, simulating multiple scenarios and identifying patterns that are elusive to the human eye. This allows to mitigate biases and distortions – typical of exclusively human decision-making processes – and to predict risks and opportunities with greater objectivity.

At the same time, I believe that human intuition must remain key: data and numerical projections offer a starting point, but context, ethics and sensitivity towards collaborators and society remain elements of human relevance. The right balance between algorithmic analysis and strategic vision is the cornerstone of a responsible adoption of AI.

Industries Where Generative AI Is Transforming Business

As a professor of Responsible Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business & Innovation, I often see how some sectors are adopting AI extremely quickly. Many industries are already transforming rapidly. The financial sector, for example, has always been a pioneer in adopting new technologies: risk analysis, fraud prevention, algorithmic trading, and complex document management are areas where generative AI is proving to be very effective.

Healthcare and life sciences are taking advantage of AI advances in drug discovery, advanced diagnostics, and the analysis of large amounts of clinical data. Sectors such as retail, logistics, and education are also adopting AI to improve their processes and offer more personalized experiences. In light of this, I would say that no industry will be completely excluded from the changes: even “humanistic” professions, such as those related to medical care or psychological counseling, will be able to benefit from it as support, without AI completely replacing the relational and care component.

Integrating Generative AI into the Enterprise: Best Practices and Risk Management

A growing trend is the creation of specialized AI services AI-as-a-Service. These are based on large language models but are tailored to specific functionalities (writing, code checking, multimedia content production, research support, etc.). I personally use various AI-as-a-Service tools every day, deriving benefits from them for both teaching and research. I find this model particularly advantageous for small and medium-sized businesses, which can thus adopt AI solutions without having to invest heavily in infrastructure and specialized talent that are difficult to find.

Of course, adopting AI technologies requires companies to adopt a well-structured risk management strategy, covering key areas such as data protection, fairness and lack of bias in algorithms, transparency towards customers, protection of workers, definition of clear responsibilities regarding automated decisions and, last but not least, attention to environmental impact. Each AI model, especially if trained on huge amounts of data, can require significant energy consumption.

Furthermore, when we talk about generative AI and conversational models , we add concerns about possible inappropriate or harmful responses (so-called “hallucinations”), which must be managed by implementing filters, quality control and continuous monitoring processes. In other words, although AI can have disruptive and positive effects, the ultimate responsibility remains with humans and the companies that use it.

Read the full article below (in Italian):

Read the article