Source:


By Francesco Derchi

Purpose is a strategic tool for driving innovation, competitive advantage, and addressing AI challenges, writes Francesco Derchi.

Since the early 2000s, technology has dominated discussions among scholars and professionals about global development and economic trends, with the first wave of research regarding the internet’s impact on firms and society focusing on the enabling potential of technologies. The concept of “digital revolution,” as popularized by Nicholas Negroponte, became the new paradigm for broader considerations about the development of the firm’s macro environment, and how businesses could leverage it as an asset for creating competitive advantage. The following wave focused on the convergence of different technologies, such as manufacturing, and included the dynamics of coexistence between humans and machines. From the management side, the major challenges are related to defining effective digital transformation practices that could help to migrate organizations and exploit this new paradigm.

The current technological focus builds on these previous trends, particularly on artificial intelligence and more recently on the emergence of generative AI. The Age of AI is characterized by technology’s power to reshape business and society on a variety of levels. While AI’s pervasive impact is not new for firms, the mainstream adoption of ChatGPT for business purposes and the response to this ready adoption from big tech players like Microsoft, Google, and more recently Apple, shows how AI is reshaping and influencing companies’ strategic priorities.

From a research perspective, AI’s societal impact is inspiring new studies in the field of ethics. Luciano Floridi, now of Yale University, has identified several challenges for AI, characterizing them by global magnitudes like its environmental impact and has identified several challenges for AI security, including intellectual property, privacy, transparency, and accountability. In his work, Floridi underlines the importance of philosophy in defining problems and designing solutions – but it is equally important to consider how these challenges can be addressed at the firm level. What are the tools for managers?

Part of the answer may lie in the increasing and recent focus of management studies around “corporate purpose” and “brand purpose.” This trend represents an important attempt to deepen our understanding of “why to act” (purpose framing) and “how to act” (purpose formalizing and internalizing), while technology management studies address the “what to act” (purpose impacting) question. Furthermore, studies show that corporate purpose is critical for both digital native firms as well as traditional companies undergoing a digital transformation, serving as an important growth engine through purpose-driven innovation. It is therefore fair to ask: can purpose help in addressing any of the AI challenges previously mentioned?

Purpose concepts are not exclusively “cause-related” like CSR and environmental impact. Other types have emerged, such as “competence” (the function of the product) and “culture” (the intent that drives the business). This broadens the consideration of impact types that can help address specific challenges in the age of AI.

Purpose-driven organizations are not new. Take Tesla’s direction “to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy” – it explicitly addresses environmental challenges while defining a business direction that requires constant innovation and leverages multiple converging technologies. The key is to have the purpose formalized and internalized within the company as a concrete drive for growth.

Due to its characteristics, the MTP plays a key role in digital transformation. This necessarily ambitious and long-term vision or goal – the Massive Transformative Purpose – requires firms, particularly those focused on exponential growth, to address emerging accelerating technologies with a purpose-first transformation logic. P&G’s Global Business Services division was able to improve market leadership and gain a competitive advantage over various start-ups and potential disruptors through its “Free up the employee, for free” MTP. This served as a north star for every employee, encouraging them to contribute ideas and best practices to overcome bulky processes and limitations.

My research on MTPs in AI-era firms explores their role in driving innovation to address specific challenges. Results show that the MTP impacts the organization across four dimensions, requiring commitment and synergy from management. Let’s consider these four dimensions by looking at Airbnb:

  1. Internal Impact: The MTP acts as the organization’s genetic code and guiding philosophy. It is key for leveraging employee motivation, with a strong relationship between purpose, organizational culture, and firm values. Airbnb’s culture of belonging highlights this, with its various purpose-shaping practices, starting with culture-fit interviews delivered during the recruitment process.
  2. Brand and Market Influence: The MTP contributes directly to building a strong brand and influencing the market. It allows firms to extend beyond functional and symbolic benefits to make the impact of the company on society visible. This involves addressing market demand coherently and consistently. Airbnb’s “Bélo” symbol visually represents this concept of belonging while their MTP features in campaigns like “Wall and Chain: A Story of Breaking Down Walls.”
  3. Competitive Advantage and Growth: The MTP drives innovation and can lead to superior stock market performance. In digital firms, it’s key in the creation of ecosystems that aggregate leveraged assets and third parties for value creation. The company’s “belong anywhere transformation journey” is a strategic initiative that formalized and interiorized the MTP through various touchpoints for all the different ecosystem members. As Leigh Gallagher details in her 2016 Fortune feature about the company, “When travellers leave their homes, they feel alone. They reach their Airbnb, and they feel accepted and taken care of by their host. They then feel safe to be the same kind of person they are when they’re at home.”
  4. Core Organization Identity: The MTP is considered part of the core dimension of the organization. More than a goal or business strategy, it is a strategic issue that generates a sense of direction and purpose that affects every part of the organization: internal, external, personality, and expression. This dimension also involves the role of the founder(s) and their personality in shaping the business. At Airbnb, the MTP is often used as a shortcut to explain the firm’s mission and vision. The founders’ approach is pragmatic, and instead of debating differences, time should be spent on execution. At the same time, the personalities of the three founders, Chesky, Gebbia, and Blecharcyzk, are the identity of the firm. They were the first hosts for the platform. Their credibility is key for making Airbnb a trustworthy and coherent proposal in a crowded market.

Executives and leaders of business in the current AI era should embrace three key principles. Be true: Purpose is an essential strategic tool that enables firms to identify and connect with their original selves, decoding their reason for being and embedding it into their identity. Be ambitious: The MTP allows for global impact, confronting major challenges by synthesizing business values and guiding innovation paths to address AI-related issues. Be generous: Purpose allows firms to explicitly address environmental and social issues, taking action on values-based challenges such as transparency, respect for intellectual property, and accountability. By following these principles, organizations and their leaders can maintain their direction and continue to advance in the AI era.

Read the full article below:

Related posts

Il Sole 24 Ore: Integrating Artificial Intelligence into the Enterprise – Challenges and Opportunities for CEOs and Management
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
Apr 14, 2025 6 min read

Source:


Expert Pierluigi Casale analyzes the adoption of AI by companies, the ethical and regulatory challenges and the differentiated approach between large companies and SMEs

By Gianni Rusconi

Easier said than done: to paraphrase the well-known proverb, and to place it in the increasingly large collection of critical issues and opportunities related to artificial intelligence, the task that CEOs and management have to adequately integrate this technology into the company is indeed difficult. Pierluigi Casale, professor at OPIT (Open Institute of Technology, an academic institution founded two years ago and specialized in the field of Computer Science) and technical consultant to the European Parliament for the implementation and regulation of AI, is among those who contributed to the definition of the AI ​​Act, providing advice on aspects of safety and civil liability. His task, in short, is to ensure that the adoption of artificial intelligence (primarily within the parliamentary committees operating in Brussels) is not only efficient, but also ethical and compliant with regulations. And, obviously, his is not an easy task.

The experience gained over the last 15 years in the field of machine learning and the role played in organizations such as Europol and in leading technology companies are the requirements that Casale brings to the table to balance the needs of EU bodies with the pressure exerted by American Big Tech and to preserve an independent approach to the regulation of artificial intelligence. A technology, it is worth remembering, that implies broad and diversified knowledge, ranging from the regulatory/application spectrum to geopolitical issues, from computational limitations (common to European companies and public institutions) to the challenges related to training large-format language models.

CEOs and AI

When we specifically asked how CEOs and C-suites are “digesting” AI in terms of ethics, safety and responsibility, Casale did not shy away, framing the topic based on his own professional career. “I have noticed two trends in particular: the first concerns companies that started using artificial intelligence before the AI ​​Act and that today have the need, as well as the obligation, to adapt to the new ethical framework to be compliant and avoid sanctions; the second concerns companies, like the Italian ones, that are only now approaching this topic, often in terms of experimental and incomplete projects (the expression used literally is “proof of concept”, ed.) and without these having produced value. In this case, the ethical and regulatory component is integrated into the adoption process.”

In general, according to Casale, there is still a lot to do even from a purely regulatory perspective, due to the fact that there is not a total coherence of vision among the different countries and there is not the same speed in implementing the indications. Spain, in this regard, is setting an example, having established (with a royal decree of 8 November 2023) a dedicated “sandbox”, i.e. a regulatory experimentation space for artificial intelligence through the creation of a controlled test environment in the development and pre-marketing phase of some artificial intelligence systems, in order to verify compliance with the requirements and obligations set out in the AI ​​Act and to guide companies towards a path of regulated adoption of the technology.

Read the full article below (in Italian):

Read the article
CCN: Australia Tightens Crypto Oversight as Exchanges Expand, Testing Industry’s Appetite for Regulation
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
Mar 31, 2025 3 min read

Source:

  • CCN, published on March 29th, 2025

By Kurt Robson

Over the past few months, Australia’s crypto industry has undergone a rapid transformation following the government’s proposal to establish a stricter set of digital asset regulations.

A series of recent enforcement measures and exchange launches highlight the growing maturation of Australia’s crypto landscape.

Experts remain divided on how the new rules will impact the country’s burgeoning digital asset industry.

New Crypto Regulation

On March 21, the Treasury Department said that crypto exchanges and custody services will now be classified under similar rules as other financial services in the country.

“Our legislative reforms will extend existing financial services laws to key digital asset platforms, but not to all of the digital asset ecosystem,” the Treasury said in a statement.

The rules impose similar regulations as other financial services in the country, such as obtaining a financial license, meeting minimum capital requirements, and safeguarding customer assets.

The proposal comes as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s center-left Labor government prepares for a federal election on May 17.

Australia’s opposition party, led by Peter Dutton, has also vowed to make crypto regulation a top priority of the government’s agenda if it wins.

Australia’s Crypto Growth

Triple-A data shows that 9.6% of Australians already own digital assets, with some experts believing new rules will push further adoption.

Europe’s largest crypto exchange, WhiteBIT, announced it was entering the Australian market on Wednesday, March 26.

The company said that Australia was “an attractive landscape for crypto businesses” despite its complexity.

In March, Australia’s Swyftx announced it was acquiring New Zealand’s largest cryptocurrency exchange for an undisclosed sum.

According to the parties, the merger will create the second-largest platform in Australia by trading volume.

“Australia’s new regulatory framework is akin to rolling out the welcome mat for cryptocurrency exchanges,” Alexander Jader, professor of Digital Business at the Open Institute of Technology, told CCN.

“The clarity provided by these regulations is set to attract a wave of new entrants,” he added.

Jader said regulatory clarity was “the lifeblood of innovation.” He added that the new laws can expect an uptick “in both local and international exchanges looking to establish a foothold in the market.”

However, Zoe Wyatt, partner and head of Web3 and Disruptive Technology at Andersen LLP, believes that while the new rules will benefit more extensive exchanges looking for more precise guidelines, they will not “suddenly turn Australia into a global crypto hub.”

“The Web3 community is still largely looking to the U.S. in anticipation of a more crypto-friendly stance from the Trump administration,” Wyatt added.

Read the full article below:

Read the article