The Magazine

La Stampa: Francesco Profumo – “The ministry only supervises individual acts. Autonomy is not up for discussion”

Source: La Stampa, also in physical edition from June 09th 2024, page 24.


Francesco Profumo: “The ministry only supervises individual acts. Autonomy is not in question”

The former president of Compagnia and Acri: “The system of institutions has antibodies. For appointments, the triad mechanism doesn’t work, a simple indication is better”

By Claudia Luise, June 9th, 2024 at 12:17

4 min reading

“Foundations have the antibodies to overcome complicated moments”. Francesco Profumo, former President of the Compagnia di San Paolo and former President of Acri (l’Associazione di Fondazioni e di Casse di Risparmio italiane) answers the phone while he is at the airport, engaged in his double life as a trainer with the academic institution OPIT (of which he is rector) and an innovator with Isybank, the online bank of Intesa Sanpaolo (of which he is President).

What is your opinion on the Crt Foundation affair?

“I don’t want to go into the Crt issue, because I don’t know the details and it’s not my responsibility, but I can report my personal experience, as a former president of the foundation. In recent months, the Compagnia di San Paolo has undertaken the process of revising its statute and renewing its governance, everything went smoothly and within the expected time frame. I believe that the Society’s statute is a good statute and that it can also be a model for other foundations. As preliminaries to the revision of the statute, which is approximately 10 years old, the new post-pandemic national and European context, the hybrid territorial foundation model and the new operating methods tested in the last 8 years, during my presidency, were posed. The designating bodies have a very important role, because they designate the Councilors of the new governance, with the skills necessary to make the foundation work well collegially. The designations are “dry”, one for each position to be renewed. The Steering Committee constitutes a collegial evaluation of the CV of each designee and votes on their appointment. The Directors thus appointed have no mandate and must work for the good of the foundation and the beneficiaries”.

If a commissioner arrives in Turin, could the “fool” made by the territory also generate repercussions within the Company?

“I do not think so. The Company has demonstrated over the decades that it is a resilient entity, despite natural transitions in governance. Some accidents can happen in a large community like that of foundations, in Italy there are 86, but I believe that there are the right antibodies to bring these events back to the right dimension”.

Is it right for foundations to be controlled at a public level?

“The ruling of the Consulta, 300 of 2003, clarified that foundations are private bodies with full statutory and management autonomy, non-profit, with social objectives, subject to legitimacy supervision of individual acts by the Treasury. So there are all the elements for these bodies to be responsibly autonomous. From this point of view there has been an interesting evolution.”

What was it?

“The thirty years of the foundations can be divided into approximately three decades. The first, from the Amato law (1990) to the Ciampi law (1999), in which well-defined rules did not yet exist and potential beneficiaries asked for resources directly from the foundations, which responded based on availability. The second, from the Ciampi law to the signing of the Acri-MEF protocol (2015), in which the rules were written, for example on the management of assets and on the maximum number of director mandates”.

And now?

“The maturity of the foundations has been underway since 2015. Today they are subjects who act, in the territories, as development agents and, as such, have developed the strategic capacity to define objectives, priorities and methods of intervention and operate in subsidiarity with other third sector subjects, public and private. Many foundations today operate in a hybrid mode: they are not only providers, but also implementers.”

What does this mutation mean?

“Foundations increasingly often implement capacity building, co-planning and results evaluation actions. The Pnrr was a very interesting field of experimentation with excellent results.”

What do you think of Lagarde’s decision to lower rates?

“The European Central Bank acted correctly.”

What path should the ECB take?

“President Lagarde’s words are very clear. “Interest rates must remain restrictive as long as necessary to ensure price stability on a lasting basis. In other words, we will still have to keep our foot on the brake pedal for a while, even if we don’t push as hard as before.”

OPIT, the leading academic institution dedicated to the digital themes, is organizing a meeting at the Grattacielo Intesa Sanpaolo in Turin on Thursday. But why do we need educational programs like this?

“Next will be the second academic year of this new institution which is based in Malta. The fundamental reason is that there is a demand for education that is closely connected to the digital transition, with all that it entails, both from the point of view of skills and the speed of change and uncertainty. Industrial revolutions previously lasted up to 90 years and therefore what you learned in school was enough for a lifetime. This industrial revolution, however, will be very short, it will last about twenty years, so it will be necessary to do more training. And then, while in the other three revolutions there was a partial replacement of people’s muscular strength with a form of energy, now for the first time we have an aid to brain activity.”

What impact does all this have on education?

“By putting these elements together, we understand that the training models and the resulting offer will have to be different compared to the past: they will have to be more diversified (different actors who will play their part in this new world that is being built) and based on a model of people’s lives that surpasses the current one, dictated by a part of studying/training, a part of work and a part of retirement. The reduction of the times of this revolution will ensure that what we have learned in school is not enough and therefore we will need to go back to school several times, unlearning things we have learned and learning new ones. In the first part of life, therefore, we must learn to learn; otherwise, updating skills will become extremely tiring for people. So there is a growing demand to decouple knowledge from skills: the former will last a lifetime, the latter will not. OPIT is an educational offer designed not on the basis of previous experiences, but on the basis of future needs. There are teachers from over 40 countries and the accreditation is done in an English-speaking nation to have a truly international spirit with students from all over the world who can contribute to the creation of this new training culture.”

What role could the Italian foundation for AI, born in Turin a few weeks ago, have?

“It is a little early to say what the operational model of the Foundation will be, the President has just been appointed and the first act will be the start of the selection procedure for the Director. The Director, who is the central figure for the development of the Centre, will have to present the Strategic Plan, which will indicate the main sectors of activity, the skills of the staff who will have to be hired initially and the network of scientific relations at local, Italian and European level , which will be launched in the first two years of the Foundation’s life. The times will not be short, also due to the competition with other similar initiatives, which are developing in Italy and Europe”.

As president of Isybank, how do you combine all the roles?

“Training, research and applications in the artificial intelligence sector are and will be increasingly interesting, with their developments happening in the coming years. We are only at the dawn of a revolution that will profoundly change our way of living, studying and working and we will have to be prepared to manage these transitions. I am sure that the speed of change and the uncertainty of the future will be two characterizing elements of this historical phase and we will have to be very careful not to forget the centrality of man and the ethical aspects with respect to the changes we will have to make. We will have to be very attentive to the education of the new generations, starting from the first years of school, but we will also have to invest with great attention in people already in adulthood, who will have to be accompanied and not abandoned. With reference to Isybank, I have started studying and I hope that in a reasonable time I will be able to make an intellectual and operational contribution to a sector of great importance for our country”.

Related posts

CCN: Australia Tightens Crypto Oversight as Exchanges Expand, Testing Industry’s Appetite for Regulation
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
Mar 31, 2025 3 min read

Source:

  • CCN, published on March 29th, 2025

By Kurt Robson

Over the past few months, Australia’s crypto industry has undergone a rapid transformation following the government’s proposal to establish a stricter set of digital asset regulations.

A series of recent enforcement measures and exchange launches highlight the growing maturation of Australia’s crypto landscape.

Experts remain divided on how the new rules will impact the country’s burgeoning digital asset industry.

New Crypto Regulation

On March 21, the Treasury Department said that crypto exchanges and custody services will now be classified under similar rules as other financial services in the country.

“Our legislative reforms will extend existing financial services laws to key digital asset platforms, but not to all of the digital asset ecosystem,” the Treasury said in a statement.

The rules impose similar regulations as other financial services in the country, such as obtaining a financial license, meeting minimum capital requirements, and safeguarding customer assets.

The proposal comes as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s center-left Labor government prepares for a federal election on May 17.

Australia’s opposition party, led by Peter Dutton, has also vowed to make crypto regulation a top priority of the government’s agenda if it wins.

Australia’s Crypto Growth

Triple-A data shows that 9.6% of Australians already own digital assets, with some experts believing new rules will push further adoption.

Europe’s largest crypto exchange, WhiteBIT, announced it was entering the Australian market on Wednesday, March 26.

The company said that Australia was “an attractive landscape for crypto businesses” despite its complexity.

In March, Australia’s Swyftx announced it was acquiring New Zealand’s largest cryptocurrency exchange for an undisclosed sum.

According to the parties, the merger will create the second-largest platform in Australia by trading volume.

“Australia’s new regulatory framework is akin to rolling out the welcome mat for cryptocurrency exchanges,” Alexander Jader, professor of Digital Business at the Open Institute of Technology, told CCN.

“The clarity provided by these regulations is set to attract a wave of new entrants,” he added.

Jader said regulatory clarity was “the lifeblood of innovation.” He added that the new laws can expect an uptick “in both local and international exchanges looking to establish a foothold in the market.”

However, Zoe Wyatt, partner and head of Web3 and Disruptive Technology at Andersen LLP, believes that while the new rules will benefit more extensive exchanges looking for more precise guidelines, they will not “suddenly turn Australia into a global crypto hub.”

“The Web3 community is still largely looking to the U.S. in anticipation of a more crypto-friendly stance from the Trump administration,” Wyatt added.

Read the full article below:

Read the article
Agenda Digitale: Generative AI in the Enterprise – A Guide to Conscious and Strategic Use
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
Mar 31, 2025 6 min read

Source:


By Zorina Alliata, Professor of Responsible Artificial Intelligence e Digital Business & Innovation at OPIT – Open Institute of Technology

Integrating generative AI into your business means innovating, but also managing risks. Here’s how to choose the right approach to get value

The adoption of generative AI in the enterprise is growing rapidly, bringing innovation to decision-making, creativity and operations. However, to fully exploit its potential, it is essential to define clear objectives and adopt strategies that balance benefits and risks.

Over the course of my career, I have been fortunate to experience firsthand some major technological revolutions – from the internet boom to the “renaissance” of artificial intelligence a decade ago with machine learning.

However, I have never seen such a rapid rate of adoption as the one we are experiencing now, thanks to generative AI. Although this type of AI is not yet perfect and presents significant risks – such as so-called “hallucinations” or the possibility of generating toxic content – ​​it fills a real need, both for people and for companies, generating a concrete impact on communication, creativity and decision-making processes.

Defining the Goals of Generative AI in the Enterprise

When we talk about AI, we must first ask ourselves what problems we really want to solve. As a teacher and consultant, I have always supported the importance of starting from the specific context of a company and its concrete objectives, without inventing solutions that are as “smart” as they are useless.

AI is a formidable tool to support different processes: from decision-making to optimizing operations or developing more accurate predictive analyses. But to have a significant impact on the business, you need to choose carefully which task to entrust it with, making sure that the solution also respects the security and privacy needs of your customers .

Understanding Generative AI to Adopt It Effectively

A widespread risk, in fact, is that of being guided by enthusiasm and deploying sophisticated technology where it is not really needed. For example, designing a system of reviews and recommendations for films requires a certain level of attention and consumer protection, but it is very different from an X-ray reading service to diagnose the presence of a tumor. In the second case, there is a huge ethical and medical risk at stake: it is necessary to adapt the design, control measures and governance of the AI ​​to the sensitivity of the context in which it will be used.

The fact that generative AI is spreading so rapidly is a sign of its potential and, at the same time, a call for caution. This technology manages to amaze anyone who tries it: it drafts documents in a few seconds, summarizes or explains complex concepts, manages the processing of extremely complex data. It turns into a trusted assistant that, on the one hand, saves hours of work and, on the other, fosters creativity with unexpected suggestions or solutions.

Yet, it should not be forgotten that these systems can generate “hallucinated” content (i.e., completely incorrect), or show bias or linguistic toxicity where the starting data is not sufficient or adequately “clean”. Furthermore, working with AI models at scale is not at all trivial: many start-ups and entrepreneurs initially try a successful idea, but struggle to implement it on an infrastructure capable of supporting real workloads, with adequate governance measures and risk management strategies. It is crucial to adopt consolidated best practices, structure competent teams, define a solid operating model and a continuous maintenance plan for the system.

The Role of Generative AI in Supporting Business Decisions

One aspect that I find particularly interesting is the support that AI offers to business decisions. Algorithms can analyze a huge amount of data, simulating multiple scenarios and identifying patterns that are elusive to the human eye. This allows to mitigate biases and distortions – typical of exclusively human decision-making processes – and to predict risks and opportunities with greater objectivity.

At the same time, I believe that human intuition must remain key: data and numerical projections offer a starting point, but context, ethics and sensitivity towards collaborators and society remain elements of human relevance. The right balance between algorithmic analysis and strategic vision is the cornerstone of a responsible adoption of AI.

Industries Where Generative AI Is Transforming Business

As a professor of Responsible Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business & Innovation, I often see how some sectors are adopting AI extremely quickly. Many industries are already transforming rapidly. The financial sector, for example, has always been a pioneer in adopting new technologies: risk analysis, fraud prevention, algorithmic trading, and complex document management are areas where generative AI is proving to be very effective.

Healthcare and life sciences are taking advantage of AI advances in drug discovery, advanced diagnostics, and the analysis of large amounts of clinical data. Sectors such as retail, logistics, and education are also adopting AI to improve their processes and offer more personalized experiences. In light of this, I would say that no industry will be completely excluded from the changes: even “humanistic” professions, such as those related to medical care or psychological counseling, will be able to benefit from it as support, without AI completely replacing the relational and care component.

Integrating Generative AI into the Enterprise: Best Practices and Risk Management

A growing trend is the creation of specialized AI services AI-as-a-Service. These are based on large language models but are tailored to specific functionalities (writing, code checking, multimedia content production, research support, etc.). I personally use various AI-as-a-Service tools every day, deriving benefits from them for both teaching and research. I find this model particularly advantageous for small and medium-sized businesses, which can thus adopt AI solutions without having to invest heavily in infrastructure and specialized talent that are difficult to find.

Of course, adopting AI technologies requires companies to adopt a well-structured risk management strategy, covering key areas such as data protection, fairness and lack of bias in algorithms, transparency towards customers, protection of workers, definition of clear responsibilities regarding automated decisions and, last but not least, attention to environmental impact. Each AI model, especially if trained on huge amounts of data, can require significant energy consumption.

Furthermore, when we talk about generative AI and conversational models , we add concerns about possible inappropriate or harmful responses (so-called “hallucinations”), which must be managed by implementing filters, quality control and continuous monitoring processes. In other words, although AI can have disruptive and positive effects, the ultimate responsibility remains with humans and the companies that use it.

Read the full article below (in Italian):

Read the article